Actually, Anonymous 5, you DO see her arse! Completely visible right here: http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_nmfnJrcW1PU/R_pHWJ3Ip-I/AAAAAAAAA8k/q3e819b24t8/s1600-h/PDVD_025.BMP
I'm SURPRISED that with Disney who made KIDS cartoons (not "adult" cartoons), and with this classic being made in a more innocent time when nudity and sexuality was NOT considered ok in movies (before morality was thrown out the window in more modern times), this is the type of scene I'd LEAST expect to see. NO WONDER that there's a conspiracy theory that Disney is run by Satan worshipers!!!!!
If I had kids, I'd not let them see this cartoon until they were AT LEAST 14 years old! But this cartoon movie isn't rated PG-13, not even PG. It's rated G. What SANE person would let let their 8yo kid watch this softcore PORN!?
Not hardcore but it IS porn. It's nudity (people can say that's "art", so it's not bad for kids), and that still is softcore porn. And using different wording calling it "nude art" to make it seem "ok for kids", is STUPID and WRONG. It should be PG-13 rated AT LEAST, and I'd PREFER an R rating!
I got some suggesting to add on here. Minx:"Straight from the Heart,"The Stingers Hit Town (Parts 1 and 2)" Jem:"Straight from the Heart" Gwen Tennyson:"In Charm's Way" Eunice:"The Transmogrification of Eunice"
Anime, everybody has a different perspective on that. Rumor goes that most of the writers at Disney are on acid when coming up with movies. How's that for so called 'innocence'?
And I assume you would let your kids watch anything else besides a movie that contains ONE (one!) scene of something that the most prude, religious-conservatite, democrat would suggest is leaning towards 'porn'. Have you ever taken a look at other cartoons and the amount of violence it contains? Goddamnit, this is what's wrong with countries like America. They don't give a flying fuck if characters get mauled by grizzly bears, wacked by giant hammers or incinerated to the bone. But when a character even exposes the slightest thing close to genitalia or (in the female case) bewbs, then hell breaks lose! What is wrong with subjects like sex and nudity that justifies violence? Fucking hypocrites
You're doing God's work, Sir. God's work!
ReplyDeleteGod damn Ariel's beautiful
ReplyDeleteAny more of these?
ReplyDeletemy favorite scene was when she showed her feet and wiggled her toes
ReplyDeleteone of the hottest characters ever!
ReplyDeleteActually, Anonymous 5, you DO see her arse! Completely visible right here: http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_nmfnJrcW1PU/R_pHWJ3Ip-I/AAAAAAAAA8k/q3e819b24t8/s1600-h/PDVD_025.BMP
ReplyDeleteI'm SURPRISED that with Disney who made KIDS cartoons (not "adult" cartoons), and with this classic being made in a more innocent time when nudity and sexuality was NOT considered ok in movies (before morality was thrown out the window in more modern times), this is the type of scene I'd LEAST expect to see. NO WONDER that there's a conspiracy theory that Disney is run by Satan worshipers!!!!!
ReplyDeleteIf I had kids, I'd not let them see this cartoon until they were AT LEAST 14 years old! But this cartoon movie isn't rated PG-13, not even PG. It's rated G. What SANE person would let let their 8yo kid watch this softcore PORN!?
Not hardcore but it IS porn. It's nudity (people can say that's "art", so it's not bad for kids), and that still is softcore porn. And using different wording calling it "nude art" to make it seem "ok for kids", is STUPID and WRONG. It should be PG-13 rated AT LEAST, and I'd PREFER an R rating!
I got some suggesting to add on here.
ReplyDeleteMinx:"Straight from the Heart,"The Stingers Hit Town (Parts 1 and 2)"
Jem:"Straight from the Heart"
Gwen Tennyson:"In Charm's Way"
Eunice:"The Transmogrification of Eunice"
Anime, everybody has a different perspective on that. Rumor goes that most of the writers at Disney are on acid when coming up with movies. How's that for so called 'innocence'?
ReplyDeleteAnd I assume you would let your kids watch anything else besides a movie that contains ONE (one!) scene of something that the most prude, religious-conservatite, democrat would suggest is leaning towards 'porn'. Have you ever taken a look at other cartoons and the amount of violence it contains? Goddamnit, this is what's wrong with countries like America. They don't give a flying fuck if characters get mauled by grizzly bears, wacked by giant hammers or incinerated to the bone. But when a character even exposes the slightest thing close to genitalia or (in the female case) bewbs, then hell breaks lose! What is wrong with subjects like sex and nudity that justifies violence? Fucking hypocrites